Pompeo says human rights policy must prioritise property rights and religion

  • >>Pranshu Verma, The New York Times
    Published: 2020-07-17 15:25:26 BdST

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo speaks during a news conference at the State Department in Washington, Jan 7, 2020. Pompeo delivered a divisive speech on July 16 calling for the United States to ground its human rights policy more prominently in religious liberty and property rights. Erin Schaff/The New York Times

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a divisive speech Thursday calling for the United States to ground its human rights policy more prominently in religious liberty and property rights.

Pompeo’s speech, at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, came as he announced the release of a report created by a panel he commissioned last year to suggest how US human rights policy could better reflect the “nation’s founding principles.”

“It’s important for every American, and for every American diplomat, to recognise how our founders understood unalienable rights,” Pompeo said. “Foremost among these rights are property rights and religious liberty.”

Human rights scholars have criticised Pompeo’s panel since its inception, noting it was filled with conservatives who were intent on promoting views against abortion and marriage equality. Critics also warned that it sidestepped the State Department’s internal bureau responsible for promoting human rights abroad.

Experts have said that Pompeo’s efforts to prioritise religion in particular above other ideals in US diplomacy could reverse the country’s long-standing belief that “all rights are created equal” and embolden countries that persecute same-sex couples or deny women access to reproductive health services for religious reasons.

“Human rights are not a choose-your-own-adventure,” said Tarah Demant, the director of the gender, sexuality and identity program at Amnesty International USA. “The US State Department’s effort to cherry-pick rights in order to deny some their human rights is a dangerous political stunt that could spark a race to the bottom by human rights-abusing governments around the world.”

At the event Thursday, which opened with a religious invocation from Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the archbishop of New York, Pompeo also waded into the culture war against what President Donald Trump recently called “a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values and indoctrinate our children.”

“Today, the very core of what it means to be an American, indeed the American way of life itself, is under attack,” Pompeo said. “Instead of seeking to improve America, too many leading voices promulgate hatred of our founding principles.”

He specifically criticised The 1619 Project, a New York Times initiative reexamining the legacy of slavery, describing it as part of “a dark vision of America’s birth” and a “disturbed reading of our history.”

In a statement, Eileen Murphy, a spokeswoman for the Times, responded to Pompeo’s criticism.

“The 1619 Project, based on decades of recent historical scholarship that has deepened our understanding of the country’s founding, is one of the most impactful works of journalism published last year,” she said. “We’re proud that it continues to spark a dialogue that allows us to reexamine our assumptions about the past.”

Since naming the Commission on Unalienable Rights, as his panel is called, Pompeo, an evangelical Christian, has expressed confidence that it would create a document that enshrines religious freedom as a central tenet of U.S. human rights policy, which diplomats could refer to for “decades to come.”

But human rights scholars cautioned that this could set a global precedent for other nations to define human rights on their own terms, undermining diplomatic efforts to stop the persecution of religious minorities in places like China, or the promotion of women’s rights in countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia.

“You’re seeing the rise of autocrats across the world,” said Akila Radhakrishnan, president of the Global Justice Center, an international human rights organisation. “You’re giving a gift to those people, and not only taking away US leadership but giving them and feeding them arguments they’ve long been making as well.”

The commission is led by Mary Ann Glendon, a Harvard Law School professor and former ambassador to the Vatican. She is a prominent anti-abortion activist who has stirred controversy in recent years for making comments that awarding The Boston Globe the Pulitzer Prize for its reporting on child abuse by Catholic priests “would be like giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Osama bin Laden.”

The panel is also rooted in the vision of Robert George, a Princeton professor and leading proponent of “natural law” theory, a term that human rights scholars say is code for “God-given rights” and is commonly deployed in fights to roll back rights for women and LGBTQ people.

The commission’s draft report will undergo a two-week public comment period before it becomes final.

Several human rights organisations have asked the federal court to prevent the State Department from relying on the report’s recommendations, saying the commission is unlawful because it violates federal laws requiring advisory panels to be “fairly balanced” and transparent.

Lawyers representing the State Department are expected to respond early next week.

© 2020 New York Times News Service